FROM DICTIONARY TO LLMs: RETHINKING LANGUAGE LEARNING, ASSESSMENT, AND TEACHER ROLES IN THE ERA OF GENERATIVE AI
Keywords:
language learning, generative AI, assessment and teachers' roleAbstract
Assessment in language learning has become increasingly complex in the era of generative artificial intelligence, particularly when learners’ integrity and ethical awareness are not yet sufficiently developed. This study aims to map the shifting landscape of language learning amid the rapid emergence of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini. Employing a literature review methodology, this study analyzed 20 relevant peer-reviewed articles published between 2023 and 2025 that examine language learning practices in the context of generative AI. The findings reveal an evolutionary shift in language learning practices, moving from passive reference tools such as printed and digital dictionaries toward interactive, adaptive, and dialogic systems. The expanded access to linguistic input, real-time feedback, and personalized practice is concentrated on practical and procedural aspects of language learning, including writing support, grammar correction, vocabulary practice, translation, and automated feedback rather than deeper understanding of structures, meaning-making processes, and the construction of knowledge in long-term memory. This imbalance indicates that current AI-supported practices tend to enhance efficiency and surface-level performance rather than durable language competence. The findings suggest an urgent need to redesign language assessment practices that align with emerging cultures of AI-assisted autonomous learning while maintaining academic integrity and meaningful learning.
Abstract
Assessment in language learning has become increasingly complex in the era of generative artificial intelligence, particularly when learners’ integrity and ethical awareness are not yet sufficiently developed. This study aims to map the shifting landscape of language learning amid the rapid emergence of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini. Employing a literature review methodology, this study analyzed 20 relevant peer-reviewed articles published between 2023 and 2025 that examine language learning practices in the context of generative AI. The findings reveal an evolutionary shift in language learning practices, moving from passive reference tools such as printed and digital dictionaries toward interactive, adaptive, and dialogic systems. The expanded access to linguistic input, real-time feedback, and personalized practice is concentrated on practical and procedural aspects of language learning, including writing support, grammar correction, vocabulary practice, translation, and automated feedback rather than deeper understanding of structures, meaning-making processes, and the construction of knowledge in long-term memory. This imbalance indicates that current AI-supported practices tend to enhance efficiency and surface-level performance rather than durable language competence. The findings suggest an urgent need to redesign language assessment practices that align with emerging cultures of AI-assisted autonomous learning while maintaining academic integrity and meaningful learning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JR-ELT (Journal of Research in English Language Teaching)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)













