Descriptive Analysis of Assesment Practices in ELT: Teacher’s Perspectives and Challenges
Keywords:
Educational Policy, Evaluation Literacy, Formative Assessment, Summative Assesment, Professional DevelopmentAbstract
This study looks at how English language teaching (ELT) teachers see evaluation processes and points out the challenges they run across when bringing them to pass. A mixed-methods approach was applied to interview a large sample of English teachers from various educational environments both qualitatively and statistically. The results reveal a strong inclination for formative assessment strategies that increase student participation and provide instantaneous feedback, such tests and peer review. Conversely, summative assessments—which resemble high-stakes tests—are sometimes viewed as demanding and as inaccurate of a reflection of students' actual abilities. This paper emphasizes major challenges to individualized feedback and inventive assessment strategies including time constraints, large class numbers, and pressure from standardized testing. The lack of opportunities for evaluation literacy professional development presented still another major challenge. Although technology integration in evaluations is thought to increase participation, it also raises questions regarding data protection and fair access. These findings underline the need of a comprehensive evaluation plan that honors formative activities and meets criteria for summative evaluation. Examined are recommendations for improved professional development and educational policy in order to support effective assessment strategies.
Abstract
This study looks at how English language teaching (ELT) teachers see evaluation processes and points out the challenges they run across when bringing them to pass. A mixed-methods approach was applied to interview a large sample of English teachers from various educational environments both qualitatively and statistically. The results reveal a strong inclination for formative assessment strategies that increase student participation and provide instantaneous feedback, such tests and peer review. Conversely, summative assessments—which resemble high-stakes tests—are sometimes viewed as demanding and as inaccurate of a reflection of students' actual abilities. This paper emphasizes major challenges to individualized feedback and inventive assessment strategies including time constraints, large class numbers, and pressure from standardized testing. The lack of opportunities for evaluation literacy professional development presented still another major challenge. Although technology integration in evaluations is thought to increase participation, it also raises questions regarding data protection and fair access. These findings underline the need of a comprehensive evaluation plan that honors formative activities and meets criteria for summative evaluation. Examined are recommendations for improved professional development and educational policy in order to support effective assessment strategies.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JR-ELT (Journal of Research in English Language Teaching)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)













