The Notorious Voice of OpenAI ChatGPT in Finishing an Essay Writing Task in English Class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30631/wttnw641Keywords:
ChatGPT, Essay Writing, English Class, AI in Education, Academic WritingAbstract
This study explores the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistance tool in English essay writing tasks among second-year EFL students. Triggered by discrepancies between assignment quality and in-class performance, the study investigates how students use, perceive, and critically evaluate ChatGPT. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through a 30-item Likert-scale questionnaire distributed to 35 students. Based on data, 84.8% of students reported using Google Translate more frequently than ChatGPT, and only 18.2% admitted full reliance on ChatGPT for essay tasks. Over half of the students expressed scepticism about ChatGPT's grammatical reliability, and many found its writing style rigid. The findings reveal that while ChatGPT is widely known and occasionally used, students still rely more on tools like Google Translate and do not fully depend on ChatGPT.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JR-ELT (Journal of Research in English Language Teaching)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
