EVALUATING VALUE: A COMPARATIVE DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF ADJECTIVAL WORDS IN HIGH-END AND BUDGET SMARTPHONE REVIEWS
Keywords:
discourse analysis, smartphone reviews, adjectives, consumer perception, corpus linguisticsAbstract
This study investigates how reviewers linguistically construct evaluations of high-end and budget smartphones through adjective usage in YouTube video reviews. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research analyzes English captions from ten review videos and processes them with AntConc to identify frequency patterns and discourse functions. The findings show clear lexical distinctions between the two categories. High-end smartphone reviews favor adjectives such as new, best, and better, emphasizing innovation, premium identity, and advanced features, including emerging AI-driven functions. In contrast, budget smartphone reviews rely heavily on adjectives like good, same, and little, framing these devices as practical, affordable, and often built upon recycled or minimally improved components. The analysis demonstrates how evaluative language shapes consumer perceptions by positioning flagship models as technologically progressive, while presenting budget devices as sufficient within financial constraints. The discussion connects these findings to existing literature on product discourse, innovation framing, and brand image formation. Overall, the study highlights how linguistic choices in reviews influence consumer expectations, particularly regarding AI advancements in high-end smartphones and camera performance across market tiers.
Abstract
This study investigates how reviewers linguistically construct evaluations of high-end and budget smartphones through adjective usage in YouTube video reviews. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research analyzes English captions from ten review videos and processes them with AntConc to identify frequency patterns and discourse functions. The findings show clear lexical distinctions between the two categories. High-end smartphone reviews favor adjectives such as new, best, and better, emphasizing innovation, premium identity, and advanced features, including emerging AI-driven functions. In contrast, budget smartphone reviews rely heavily on adjectives like good, same, and little, framing these devices as practical, affordable, and often built upon recycled or minimally improved components. The analysis demonstrates how evaluative language shapes consumer perceptions by positioning flagship models as technologically progressive, while presenting budget devices as sufficient within financial constraints. The discussion connects these findings to existing literature on product discourse, innovation framing, and brand image formation. Overall, the study highlights how linguistic choices in reviews influence consumer expectations, particularly regarding AI advancements in high-end smartphones and camera performance across market tiers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JR-ELT (Journal of Research in English Language Teaching)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
